Shot on 75mm film, with an absence of C.G.I.and close attention paid to aerial shots, what’s not to like? The answer is absolutely everything. The absence of almost any conversation makes it extremely difficult to care whether the film’s characters get off the beach or not! I hate it when  film makers slot in images of British soldiers being mown down just to add ” seriousness” to the proceedings. As the retreating British are mown down by the un-named “enemy”, one is put in mind of The Devil’s Own where the I.R.A. create a mini Somme in Belfast.

One does get the impression, rightly I think, that Britain had bitten off more than it could chew in 1940. But, because the characterisation is so weak, you hardly understand the feelings of relief that must have been engendered. The death of the teenage volunteer, at the hands of the flailing beach survivor, is a dark moment and does serve to underline the desperation. But the reliance on action shots and spectacle only detracts.


The 1958 version, with John Mills, is in my view far superior. That film was a box-office flop at the time. Perhaps the audience weren’t ready to hear the message of national decline and dire warnings of what happens when you are ill-prepared? Are we any more ready to hear such a message today?

6 responses to “Dunkirk 2017- #not for me!”

  1. I enjoyed it myself, but I can see where one might not have as well. Interesting read.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks Ann..you maybe interested that after this weekend I shall also be looking for social meaning in Nijago the Movie and Captain Underpants! It’s been a long half term😖😖😥😓😰😿

      Like

  2. I just saw the film today. I noticed what you said and would say the 1958 version is better. Especially for someone who does not know the history well then the 1958 version is better. I did feel the film conveyed the individual self sacrifice of many individuals associated with the events at Dunkirk though very powerfully such as the RAF pilot, the pleasure boat captain and his son.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for your comments. I think I’m just biased against the modern trend of image over characters.

      Like

    2. It did leave character development largely out of the film which is something one notices right away. My wife got motion sickness from the film. Did not bother me but as I thought about all the images moving around to convey motion in the air and on the sea really could get to someone.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Great news- I shall book my wife into the matinee- all week!
        Funny how film can get to you though. I’ve just got through Gomorah series three and some of the scenes in that had me really moved- and that was set in run down parts of Napoli.

        Like

Leave a comment

Trending